I am Yasuyuki Sakane. This archive systematizes the results of technical due diligence (DD) centered on "Structural Intelligence." As a "Systemic Architect," I publicly share my achievements in unraveling the complex structures of technologies and markets in multiple layers and evaluating their essential value and risks.

<aside> ⚠️ Page Introduction, Author, Terminology

This page is an archive that systematizes the results of technical due diligence (DD) from the perspective of Structural Intelligence.

It systematizes the outcomes of technical due diligence (DD) I have conducted, from the viewpoint of Structural Intelligence.
For each project, it presents case studies where I have comprehensively evaluated value and future potential, selecting essential elements to be preserved for the future.
Please click on each title for details. </aside>
Author Introduction: Yasuyuki Sakane
"Structural Intelligence"
Terminology/FAQ

Technical Due Diligence List

If you are interested in the details and insights of each technical due diligence achievement, please click on the collection titles below.
Each project's key points are concisely summarized, allowing even first-time readers to quickly access themes and evaluation examples of interest.
For those who wish to experience the practice of Structural Intelligence, please view the achievements through each link.

2024: Due Diligence of Company X's AI Cybersecurity Technology

Conducted due diligence on the technical capabilities and Japan market suitability of Israeli AI cybersecurity company X, based on a request from Japanese investment firm Y. Under limited information disclosure, a detailed analysis was performed on the technical limitations of its AI-driven solutions (LLM capability constraints, lack of real-time monitoring and advanced AI analysis, dependence on known threat frameworks, low capability to respond to unknown threats). Furthermore, a lack of suitability for the Japanese legal system (Article 21 of the Constitution: "Secrecy of Communications") and business culture was identified. It was judged that immediate utilization as "proactive defense" and early market results would be difficult. Recommendations included a fundamental strengthening of the technology base (real-time analysis, introduction of quantitative risk assessment), localization for the Japanese market (legal compliance, building partnerships with domestic IT companies), and a phased market entry strategy. This recommendation reinforced Company Y's decision to forgo a large-scale investment in Company X, contributing to the avoidance of investment risk and the rebuilding of a strategic approach for the Japanese market.

2024: Due Diligence of Company X's AI Cybersecurity Technology | Notion

2020: Major MSSP Integration Due Diligence and Growth Strategy Transformation (English)

During the acquisition of a major MSSP, a meticulous analysis of multifaceted integration risks was conducted, including the target business's dependence on legacy technology, quality issues, failure to meet KPIs for 24-hour operations, and omission of acquiring key technology (CTI). Quantitatively assessing the quality degradation and cost increase from a hasty company-wide integration, a policy prioritizing the maintenance of independent operations and the evolution of its own MSS was proposed. This advice prompted the headquarters to avoid integration risks and decide on an independent growth path, significantly contributing to share expansion in the global market and gaining trust in the Japanese market.